Sujit Choudhry’s Advances in Rooting Comparative Constitutional Law

Sujit Choudhry is one of the unsurpassed experts when it comes to tackling matters pertaining to upholding the constitutional law as well as practicing democracy in politics (patch.com). With his rich experience in solving legal matters for different countries across the globe, he has formulated ways of eradicating unhealthy conflicts within the political setups ensuring that the rights of every citizen are preserved. Additionally, the use of the comparative constitutional law has enabled him to manage security sectors effectively (http://constitutionaltransitions.org/director/#Choudhry).  His works of literature include books on Canadian constitutional law, Constitutional Democracies in Crisis and much more.

Most of all, he drives his attention to more pressing matters such as the information posted by a former Attorney General who ruled under the regime of President Barack Obama of the United States of America, Eric Holder. The post on social media elicited reactions from Sujit Choudhry who concluded that telling the people of such a powerful state to take matters into their own hands while reacting to violation of rights is unlawful and unethical. Holder’s advice to the public was more of self-enforcement of the law than trying to lead people to justice using the right channels.

In as much as peaceful demonstrations are constitutional, it should never be the first thought to solving political conflicts. Sujit Choudhry adds that telling people to draw red lines foreshadows democratic failure which is likely to breed dictatorships. Such motivate elected politicians extending their terms in office hence resulting in unethical constitutional practices.

Nevertheless, constitutional democracy still faces a variety of setbacks despite all the work that representatives put into amending laws and putting them forward for use by nations. He goes ahead and addresses some of the threats that the constitution has encountered in countries like Poland. However, the people in charge of amending these laws have done everything in their power to ensure that they employ lawful measures in making decisions regarding voting, formulating rules to protect the constitutional panels, delegating duties to judges in the courts of law and much more. Sujit Choudhry states that the representatives of the law should be straightforward in their actions and avoid issues that are likely to cripple constitutional law. More of his views on iconnectblog.com

Keep up with Choudhry, visit Crunchbase

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *